Skip to content

Sleep In Peace Tonight

January 6, 2013

american-spirit-jan-baughmanWith  the help of Paul Howe from, it is time to put the idea of gun confiscation to rest.  Many people today are concerned that the Liberals in the District of Criminals will pass laws outlawing guns, maybe not all guns, but many kinds that are very popular and many that we carry concealed for our self-protection and the protection of our family.  I have published several articles about this subject, including the fact that the 2nd Amendment is not negotiable.  The claim that there needs to be a discussion about gun control is just fluff from the gun grabbers.  They think that we will just give up our guns, many handed down from generation to generation, because some nut shoots up a school and commits a horrible mass murder.  That shooting will be the subject of my next article, so lets stick with the gun grabbers and all their fluff.  Lets say that they win and guns are outlawed.  Gun confiscation will begin in one week if we don’t voluntarily turn in our guns.  Here is what Paul Howe has to say about that.

So just who will be tasked to confiscate our guns?  Let’s take a look at who and why it won’t happen.  You can rest assured that the gun grabbing liberals won’t be involved in this aspect, as they would turn into snivelling cowards at the first sound of gunfire.  Let’s look:

United Nations (UN)
We are the UN.  Other countries mostly join the U.N. to secure money, funding and training and few have any offensive combat capability. Most serve as guards at static locations and have no will to fight.  America is the enforcement arm of the U.N.  We have the money, equipment, personnel and lift platforms to get the job done.

If the president ever let the U.N. in this country, it would be a foreign invasion and armed Americans would stand up and crush them in a day. Our government would break down and the president would be ousted for letting foreign militaries invade our country.

Federal Government Military
Having served over 20 years in our military, I know that most soldiers would refuse the order to take part in the confiscation of weapons. First, the president would have to give the order, which is an “Illegal Order” in violation of the constitution.  I don’t believe that service members would go back into the communities that raised them and conduct raids on good Americans in violation of the constitution.

Remember, these forces would have to come from a military base that is surrounded and supported by American communities.  Civilians would simply cease to support the bases and they would fold in a short time.  Cut of the fuel, food, electricity on bases and this would stop the silliness.   Also, many, many service members live in the communities and they would have to travel from their houses to base unless they were locked down.  In that case, their families would still be in the community and people would not be too friendly to those supporting these actions.

Federal Government DHS or TSA
The Federal government is not large enough or talented enough to seize guns.  If they were to do 5-8 raids a day seizing guns, they would be physically and mentally exhausted and need a break.  Physically conducting raids is exhausting.  After the first few raids, the word would get out and Americans would start to fight back.  It would take one good ambush from a house or along a travel route to decimate a tactical force or make it combat ineffective

Next, most Federal Agencies work out of a fixed location centrally located in a community.  Also, their personnel live in those communities along with their families.  Once the word got out that they were doing raids in violation to the constitution, they and their families would be at risk.  If they were to start raiding houses, kicking in doors and breaking in windows looking for legally owned guns, their homes would be subject to the same treatment by Americans rising up to defend themselves.  They would shortly find themselves without a place to live.

State Law Enforcement
The Governor would have to order State and Local Law Enforcement to either:

  • Seize guns
  • Ignore the Federal Orders

If they ignore the Federal Orders, things would be tense, but people would be civil. If they started to seize guns, they only have limited people and assets to do this. Much the same consequences would take place as with the Federal Government.

Local Law Enforcement
Local Police and Sheriff Departments are the backbone of who protects American Citizens.  A Sheriff or Chief of Police would have to give the order for his people to begin to seize weapons.  Their people would either comply or see it as an illegal order and refuse.

Remember, Chiefs and Sheriff’s also have to live and work in the same communities they serve. As I described with the Federal Government, local Tactical Teams could probably only do 8-10 hits in a day and then need a break. So they hit ten houses and seize their guns, the word would get out and now they are subject to living in the same community as those they are attacking.  It would not go well.  Also, after one or two determined Americans or combat vets fought back, the team would lose many to death or injury and they would have made a decision whether to continue to push the fight.  Remember also, they have to sleep sometime.  Their homes and families would be at risk.  It is an ugly scenario at best.

Here, Paul provides some more refreshing and interesting thoughts:

tell-34305519563Nation of Combat Veterans and Patriots
Having been at war for over 10 years, we have a nation of combat vets and contractors that have seen more action than many of our WWII vets.  It has been said that only a small percentage of Americans stood up to the British War machine in the Revolutionary War.  Americans are better armed and trained today than at any time in our nation’s history. Think about what would happen if just our nation’s veterans stood up. People have been buying more guns and ammunition in the past five years than any time in my life. The guns and ammunition are out there along with the talent to use them.

Kool-Aid Drinkers
Kool-Aid Drinkers is the term I use to describe the Jonestown voluntarily massacre where the Peoples Temple Agricultural Project, a dedicated community western Guyana by the Peoples Temple led by cult leader Jim Jones intentionally drank poison Kool-Aid.  Over 900 people died.

In every law enforcement, government and military agency or branch, there are a small number of Kool-Aid drinkers who would blindly follow orders.  They would either be purged internally by their co-workers or people they attacked would stop their gene pool.

Also, at the police tactical team level, all members “volunteer” for the job and they can have the individual integrity to terminate their team service at any time if their profession becomes corrupt or misguided.  I know many a good officer that has done that in the past.

Finally, there would be a certain number of American Kool-Aid drinkers that would turn in their weapons if asked.  I believe it would be a small percentage as there are always those that do not have the will to resist or fight and they are not needed should thing get tough.

treeoflibertyWhile Paul’s original article continues and is much longer, I would like to end this article leaving you with the good feeling that gun confiscation is very unlikely.  If that is something that weighs heavily on you, tonight and every night now on, you can sleep in peace!

I do believe our guns are safe for now, but the gun grabbers won’t stop anytime soon.  They are the enemy of liberty, while they are entitled to their opinions, we should all remember that violence is not necessary.  Let’s save our energy for the future when we may need it in defense of liberty!



6 Comments leave one →
  1. January 7, 2013 9:55 am

    Great article G!

    Sorry, but I think they will try. Fienstein & Pelosi will not be on the front lines. They will be in their pampered chambers issuing edicts to the peasants. Obama will be in Hawaii. It always starts with “reasonable” infringements such as registration. Registration means at some date, confiscation will be enacted.

    • gmanfortruth permalink*
      January 7, 2013 10:29 am

      LOI, All I can say, if they want them, their going to have to shoot their way in to get’em 🙂

  2. Bottom Line permalink
    January 7, 2013 10:31 am

    Imagine you’re in charge and have to take away the guns.

    Anyone who has done so understands how problematic it is. It ain’t happenin’, …at least not without a bloody revolution.

    Anti-gun lobby folks are getting suckered into giving a bunch of money and support to politicians who scare gun owners into buying more guns.


  3. WHITEHORN permalink
    January 7, 2013 10:48 am


  4. Judy Sabatini permalink
    January 7, 2013 12:28 pm

    I know that my oldest son, who is in the military, as well as his wife, both said, they will take off their uniforms before going door to door in confiscating people’s guns , for they have guns themselves, & are not likely to give them up any time soon. Even my youngest will not blindly hand his over. They both said, that at least 90% of military would not in any way follow any orders to do so if given that command. As for law enforcement, who knows, maybe some would, some wouldn’t. As for the politicians themselves, nobody can’t tell me that some of them themselves don’t carry for protection. They’re nothing but hypocrites who I’m sure have well armed protection while going from place to place. Obama’s daughters have, what, 12 armed secret service with them at all times while in school & at any given time. Not to mention his wife, & him for that matter. Guns aren’t the only weapon out there, anything can be used as a weapon. People will always find a way to get guns. Look at what happened during Prohibition, yeah, that worked out real well, didn’t it. If someone is determined to do harm to others, they will find a way, no matter what. But, this is only my opinion.

  5. January 7, 2013 4:41 pm

    Good Article G. I don’t believe the Government would ever be able to enforce any kind of gun confiscation. There are just too many of us gun owners out there. And not enough willing to enforce it, except in a few states maybe. And not even the WHOLE State at that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: