Skip to content

Fukushima Coverup! Part 2

April 12, 2011

Here we are, a month away from the Japanese earthquake/tsunami disaster.   This terrible disaster precluded an event that very few people can imagine, the meltdown of  four nuclear powerplants, at the same time no less.  This event is occurring at the Fukushima Daiichia nuclear plant.  Most people don’t trust the Federal Government or the MSM when it comes to telling the truth to the American people.  Neither can seem to say anything with sensationalizing or downplaying any particular subject.  I have found that the alternative media provides a better look at what is going on at the Fukushima Daiichia nuclear plant.  I have also listened to numerous radio interviews with nuclear physicists over the course of the last two weeks.  Without further delay, here is what I have found.

The EPA has been testing water sources and milk throughout the country.  They have recently released results for several major metropolitan water supplies.   We know that the Fukushima plant is spewing numerous radioactive elements such as  Iodine-131, Cesium-134, and Cesium-137, and possibly plutonium.  The EPA is only testing for iodine-131.  If they are testing for the more deadly elements, they are not releasing that information.   The following water supplies have thus far tested positive for Iodine-131, with the dates they were collected in parenthesis to the right:

Los Angeles, Calif. – 0.39 pCi/l (4/4/11)
Philadelphia (Baxter), Penn. – 0.46 pCi/l (4/4/11)
Philadelphia (Belmont), Penn. – 1.3 pCi/l (4/4/11)
Philadelphia (Queen), Penn. – 2.2 pCi/l (4/4/11)
Muscle Shoals, Al. – 0.16 pCi/l (3/31/11)
Niagara Falls, NY – 0.14 pCi/l (3/31/11)
Denver, Colo. – 0.17 pCi/l (3/31/11)
Detroit, Mich. – 0.28 pCi/l (3/31/11)
East Liverpool, Oh. – 0.42 pCi/l (3/30/11)
Trenton, NJ – 0.38 pCi/l (3/29/11)
Painesville, Oh. – 0.43 pCi/l (3/29/11)
Columbia, Penn. – 0.20 pCi/l (3/29/11)
Oak Ridge (4442), Tenn. – 0.28 pCi/l (3/29/11)
Oak Ridge (772), Tenn. – 0.20 pCi/l (3/29/11)
Oak Ridge (360), Tenn. – 0.18 pCi/l (3/29/11)
Helena, Mont. – 0.18 pCi/l (3/28/11)
Waretown, NJ – 0.38 pCi/l (3/28/11)
Cincinnati, Oh. – 0.13 pCi/l (3/28/11)
Pittsburgh, Penn. – 0.36 pCi/l (3/28/11)
Oak Ridge (371), Tenn. – 0.63 pCi/l (3/28/11)
Chattanooga, Tenn. – 1.6 pCi/l (3/28/11)
Boise, Id. – 0.2 pCi/l (3/28/11)
Richland, Wash. – 0.23 pCi/l (3/28/11)

Again, these figures do not include the other radioactive elements being spread by Fukushima, so there is no telling what the actual cumulative radiation levels really were in these samples. The figures were also taken two weeks ago, and were only just recently reported. If current samples were taken at even more cities, and if the tests conducted included the many other radioactive elements besides Iodine-131, actual contamination levels would likely be frighteningly higher.  The EPA maximum thresholds for safety is currently set at 3.0 pico Curies per Liter (pCi/l), this threshold for safety may be changed to a higher number, as the EPA is redesignating their safety levels.

In Phoenix, Ariz., a milk sample taken on March 28, 2011, tested at 3.2 pCi/l. In Little Rock, Ark., a milk sample taken on March 30, 2011, tested at 8.9 pCi/l, which is almostthree times the EPA limit. And in Hilo, Hawaii, a milk sample collected on April 4, 2011, tested at 18 pCi/l, a level six times the EPA maximum safety threshold. The same Hawaii sample also tested at 19 pCi/l for Cesium-137, which has a half life of 30 years  and a shocking24 pCi/l for Cesium-134, which has a half life of just over two years.   Why is this milk contamination significant? Milk, of course, typically represents the overall condition of the food chain because cows consume grass and are exposed to the same elements as food crops and water supplies. In other words, when cows’ milk starts testing positive for high levels of radioactive elements, this is indicative of radioactive contamination of the entire food supply.

Japan has admitted the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster is on par with the one at Chernobyl. At the same time, Japan’s science and technology ministry reports strontium, a heavy radioactive metal that is a catalyst for leukemia, has been detected around the crippled reactors. In addition to leukemia, strontium causes cancers of the bone, nose, lung, and skin.    The alpha emitter plutonium is especially deadly. Plutonium 239 has a high half-life of around 24,000 years. Plutonium transforms into americium and enters the water table. It can contaminate a water supply for centuries. The half life of americium is 433 years.   Cesium has a tendency for adhesion to particulates in soil and sediment, making it less mobile than strontium.   Like calcium, strontium enters the human body through plant and animal products and is mainly deposited in teeth and bones. New blood is formed in the bone marrow. Leukemia is a cancer of the blood.  Strontium is much more mobile and soluble in water than cesium. Following the Chernobyl nuclear accident, strontium was detected in the ground. Experts believe that 80 percent of the strontium released by the stricken Chernobyl reactor entered the food cycle.

The Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkley reports: 

Radionuclides, once deposited by rainwater or air onto the ground, will find their way through the ecosystem. We are already tracking its path from rainwater to creek runoff to tap water, but we would also like to monitor how much these isotopes that make their way into our food. For example, how much gets taken up by the grass and eventually winds up in our milk?  We have been collecting produce that is as local as possible to test for the radioactive isotopes. We might expect different kinds of plants to take up different quantities of cesium and iodine, so we are trying to measure as many different plants and fruits as we are able to. So far, we have measured spinach, strawberries, cilantro, grass, and mushrooms. We have also measured local topsoil.  In the tables below, we are providing two numbers for each of the isotopes. The first is a standard concentration unit of Becquerel per kilogram (Bq/kg) which is the number of particles decaying per second in each kilogram of the sample. The number in parentheses after the activity is the number of kilograms that one would need to consume to equal the radiation exposure of a single round trip flight from San Francisco to Washington D.C. (0.05 mSv).  The tables can be found here:

There are a few videos concerning the Cesium 137,  both high altitude and ground level predictions for April 11th to the 13th.  They can be viewed here :

There you have what I was able to find.  At this point I see no reason for concern, as most levels of contamination are below EPA safety limits.  Unfortunately, there is really nothing we Americans can do to protect ourselves, even if it worsens.  We must eat and drink water to survive.  Let’s just hope that they get things under control and the radiation leaks are stopped real soon.   I would not be a very happy American if I was to write a Part 3  of this series.  Stay safe and remember, we’re all in this together.

Live Free!


6 Comments leave one →
  1. charlie miles permalink
    April 13, 2011 11:23 am

    maaan g-man pretty soon all those whitetails up there in gods country will be glowing in the dark!

  2. April 13, 2011 3:33 pm

    I in particular love the way the way the MSM is downplaying OR sensationalizing this disaster.

    Is it bad, or is it not bad? Why can’t we just get a straight answer? Even from the Government?

    It sure as hell SOUNDS bad, doesn’t it?

    There is one question that I have that no one seems to know. How did it get all the way over to the US that fast?

    • gmanfortruth permalink*
      April 13, 2011 3:38 pm

      Hey Esom, It got here via the jet stream, which basically goes over Japan. It took about 8 days for the first of it to be detected. That was before it got really bad. But, what can we do? Nothing.

  3. Greg Fessler permalink
    April 13, 2011 6:02 pm

    im with ya, may God be with us

  4. charlie miles permalink
    April 13, 2011 8:01 pm

    dont you mean may a fallout shelter be with us!

    • gmanfortruth permalink*
      April 13, 2011 9:06 pm

      🙂 If only we had them! I will be checking with our resident cattle farmer about radiation levels in his herd, or if he’s going to test. He also reads here, God Bless him!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: